On October 10th, 2018, Hurricane Michael made landfall in the Florida panhandle as a Category 4 storm. This powerful hurricane caused over $25 billion in damages on land, but did the impacts end there? Through collaborative efforts from FWRI Fisheries Independent Monitoring program (FIM) and the FWC Division of Marine Fisheries Management’s Artificial Reef program, scientists are setting out to assess the storm’s effects on Florida’s vibrant offshore environment and map changes to publicly accessible artificial reefs.
During a March 2019 cruise aboard the R/V Kimberly Dawn, FIM biologists utilized side- scan sonar to map over 50 square nm of sea floor near the eye path of Michael in the Northern Gulf. The images are now being compared to previously identified reef habitat in the area, and at first glance it appears the huge waves created by the storm displaced many artificial reef structures and reshaped natural reef habitats. This image shows a fifty-foot tall submerged radio tower that was dragged over 1,000 feet along the seafloor! Understanding fish habitat is vital to properly managing Florida’s valuable fisheries, and this study will provide key insight into how large storm events affect these resources.
By Alejandro Acosta, Jennifer Herbig, Jessica Keller, Danielle Morley and Colin Howe
the Keys, the finfish team was hard at work during 2018, collecting data for the
biennial reef fish underwater visual census. Underwater visual census methods
are used worldwide to survey shallow aquatic habitats. These methods are suited
to monitoring the abundance of coral reef fish because it allows for the
collection of community level data without the disturbance inherent in other,
more destructive sampling techniques. The finfish team monitors reef fish
assemblages and benthic components with the objective of detecting changes in
reef fish communities over time.
is a multi-agency partnership that includes the National Oceanic Atmospheric
Administration, National Park Service, and University of Miami-Rosenstiel
School of Marine and Atmospheric Science and we rely on each other to complete
the sampling. The RVC survey is a probability-based stratified random sampling
survey that focus hard bottom habitat in depths less than 30m. Sites are chosen by using a two-stage
stratified-random sampling design based on depth and habitat. Habitat with higher complexity has more fish,
and therefore higher variance. To
improve sampling accuracy, more sites are allocated to habitats with higher
complexity. Targeting locations that represent important
habitat for many fish species, scientists visit each of these sites to observe
the size, species, and number of fishes within their sample location.
More than 4,000 individual fish surveys were conducted during the 2018 RVC season in South Florida, and the eight members of the finfish team conducted 452 of these surveys at 113 sites in the middle Keys. They counted 89,464 individual fish, representing 187 species. FWC uses data from these surveys to help inform management decisions. For example, data from the RVCs were recently used to support the continuation of the Research Natural Area (a no-take marine reserve) in the Dry Tortugas for the next 20 years. Data are also used in stock assessments, like the upcoming SEDAR 64 for Southeastern Yellowtail Snapper. For more information, check the link. http://myfwc.com/research/saltwater/fish/research/fim-fl-keys-visual-sampling/
Stereobaited remote underwater video arrays (S-BRUVs) have become a standard gear used to sample fish distributions in aquatic systems around the world. Over the past decade, the Fisheries-Independent Monitoring (FIM) program of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) has used S-BRUVs like the array shown in Fig. 1 to study fish populations associated with natural and artificial reef habitats of the West Florida Shelf (WFS). This effort has involved thousands of 30-minute deployments in waters 10–180 m deep, from Pensacola to the Florida Keys.
Some advantages of
S-BRUVs are that they are minimally invasive to the fish community and habitat,
they are less selective than other gears, and they provide behavioral
information. However, despite these
advantages, it is difficult to determine the distance from which fishes are
attracted to the bait during a deployment.
This complicates fish-habitat relationships observed in the video by
adding uncertainty regarding the total area sampled and whether fishes observed
were in fact associated with the habitat targeted. Improving our current understanding of the
range of attraction of fishes to an S-BRUV is an important step toward determining
absolute species abundances.
Hydroacoustics use sound to detect fish in the water column in the same way that a typical fish finder works. Hydroacoustics can be used to rapidly survey a large area and are even less invasive than S-BRUVs in that they do not influence fish distributions. These features make hydroacoustics a complementary method to the S-BRUV surveys conducted by the FIM program. Figure 2 shows the results from one survey designed to evaluate spatial redistributions of fishes that take place during an S-BRUV deployment relative to before the gear entered the water. At this site located in 61 m water depth offshore of Panama City, fish abundance increased near the S-BRUV during deployment and decreased to the northwest of the site, where the current was oriented. This information will be used to improve assessments of commercially targeted fishes, sportfish, and other ecologically valuable species throughout WFS waters.
Fig. 2. Mean volume
backscatter in the lower 5 m of the water column from a hydroacoustic survey
over several patches of low-relief habitat before (left panel) and during (right
panel) deployment of an S-BRUV video array.
The dots represent data points that were interpolated throughout the 375
x 375 m survey grid, hashed areas are patches of previously identified habitat,
and brighter colors indicate higher fish abundances. The S-BRUV was deployed in the center of the
survey grid and an arrow in the right panel shows the direction of the
prevailing bottom current distributing the odor plume from the bait.
By Sean Keenan and Theresa Warner, with much assistance from coworkers
Dr. Richard “Ed” Matheson Jr., an Associate Research Scientist at the Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI), is retiring after 32 years with the Institute. A Masters from the College of William & Mary and a Ph.D. from Texas A&M University provided Ed with the basis for a career focused on the systematics and ecology of fishes. Over the years, his research interests have included Gerreid systematics, seagrass-associated fishes, fishes of tidal-rivers, fish community structure in Florida Bay, seagrass die-offs, Everglades restoration, and fishes of the West Florida Shelf.
Starting with FWRI St. Petersburg in 1987, Ed has seen the Institute transition through several agencies and name changes to become what it is today. Initially hired into the Coastal Zone Management group with the Fish Biology program, Ed became the chief ichthyologist for the Fisheries-Independent Monitoring (FIM) program in the late 1990s. With FIM’s statewide, comprehensive sampling, rare or difficult to identify species are frequently encountered and they invariably come to Ed for verification.
The accurate identification of specimens is vital to evaluating distribution and abundance trends of native and exotic species. Ed has been instrumental in developing, maintaining and ensuring the near perfect fish identification proficiency of FWRI staff. He regularly creates and presents fish identification training sessions that focus on key sportfish and difficult to identify species groups like gobies, mojarras and sunfishes. His sessions always include a presentation, access to slides and identification keys, and typically include a ‘hands-on’ component that reinforces what staff learned in the presentation. Ed’s fish identification contributions beyond FWRI have been equally important. He frequently confirms identifications of specimens being cataloged in the Ichthyology Collection of the Florida State Board of Conservation and receives requests for assistance from other groups such as FWC Law Enforcement.
The professional impact of Ed’s work at FWRI is immeasurable. He has been the lead author on five peer-reviewed manuscripts and he has co-authored over 20 manuscripts and over 10 reports. He has served as adjunct faculty at the University of South Florida (USF) and as a graduate committee member for students at USF and the University of Central Florida. Ed has participated in innumerable one day estuarine sampling trips, eight multiday research cruises, and dove in the Johnson Sea-Link submersible to 1,100 feet. He is a member of the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, American Fisheries Society and Sigma Xi. Ed has served as a reviewer for scientific journals including Bulletin of Marine Science, Estuaries, Southwestern Naturalist and Fishery Bulletin.
Ed is one of the friendliest
and most approachable scientists at FWRI. His sense of humor, pleasant
demeanor, and professional expertise have made him an invaluable and
irreplaceable asset to FWC.
Gags (Mycteroperca microlepis) support extensive commercial and recreational fisheries in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. A 2016 stock assessment did not support earlier assessments that indicated that gags are currently overfished and continue to undergo overfishing (South East Data Assessment and Review 33 update). Considering the status of Gag in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, it is especially important to improve understanding of its juvenile recruitment processes.
Past research has shown that juvenile Gags generally occupy structured polyhaline (18-30 practical salinity units) habitats such as seagrass beds and oyster reefs for several months before emigrating to nearshore reefs (Figure 1). The reliance of Gags on estuarine nurseries, combined with a brief period of estuarine occupancy, greatly facilitates the accurate characterization of the strength of juvenile recruitment.
A comprehensive examination of long-term (10+ years) FWC/FWRI fisheries-independent data was conducted to characterize habitat selection and recruitment of juvenile Gags. Results from Apalachicola Bay, Tampa Bay and Charlotte Harbor habitat suitability analyses indicated that juvenile Gags selected polyhaline habitats with sloping bottoms and extensive seagrass coverage. These analyses indicated that the near shore, deeper water polyhaline seagrass habitats had been under sampled (Switzer et al. 2012).
A multi-gear survey (183-m haul seine and 6.1-m trawl) was designed to supplement long-term, fisheries-independent survey data on estuarine-dependent reef-associated fishes. The supplemental survey design specifically considered juvenile Gag recruitment ecology and thus targeted the deep, polyhaline (>18 psu) seagrass habitats that are used by age-0 Gags. Potential sampling sites were limited to generally polyhaline waters that contained at least 50% bottom coverage of seagrass, had a measurable slope and were between 1.0 and 7.6 m deep.
This supplemental sampling was initiated in 2008 and polyhaline seagrass beds were sampled by bottom trawls (6.1-m otter trawl) and haul seines (183-m haul seines) in seven estuaries along Florida’s Gulf coast (Figure 2). Apalachicola Bay, Charlotte Harbor and Tampa Bay have been routinely sampled since the late 1990s; St. Andrew Bay and three estuaries in the Big Bend region between Cedar Key and Cape San Blas (St. Marks, Ecofina, and Steinhatchee), where Gag recruitment had been documented, were added for this study and have become part of the continuing survey.
Analyses of the data collected in the long-term and supplemental surveys (2008-2012) demonstrated the effectiveness of this sampling approach. The size ranges of Gags collected in both studies were similar, but age-0 individuals were captured more frequently and the catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) was significantly higher in the supplemental surveys (Switzer et al 2015). These analyses will not only enhance our understanding of recruitment processes for juvenile Gags in the eastern Gulf but will also provide valuable insight into observed patterns of habitat use and the relative importance of various habitat types. Nevertheless, additional information on habitat availability, combined with a better understanding of the estuarine systems’ relative contributions to nearshore Gag populations, will be required to maximize the utility of these data in predicting fisheries productivity.
Strong Gag year-classes have been documented as persisting as the fish grow and enter the fishery. Accordingly, accurate estimation and prediction of juvenile recruitment is critical to the effective assessment and management of at-risk fisheries. Variability of estuarine nekton assemblages is valuable as an indicator of environmental quality. Therefore, the patterns discerned from the supplemental sampling have important implications for fisheries managers.
By Casey Butler, Maria Cooksey, Gabrielle Renchen and Emily Hutchinson
The Keys Fisheries Research program took to the skies in partnership with the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (hereafter Sanctuary) management team to conduct an aerial survey of vessel use in the Sanctuary. Within the boundaries of the Sanctuary lie nationally significant marine resources, including hundreds of uninhabited Keys, the world’s third largest barrier reef, hard-bottom habitat, seagrass beds, mangrove trees, and more than 6,000 species of marine life. The Florida Keys are home for ~79,000 year-round residents and provide a destination for ~5 million visitors annually. Over the last few decades the number of registered vessels has increased, but the activities of these boaters and how their use of Sanctuary resources have changed over time is not well known. Understanding the patterns of boating activity in the Sanctuary is vital to evaluating the sustainable use of the valuable marine resources of the Sanctuary.
FWRI scientists flew in small planes over the breathtaking waters of the Keys and recorded the type, location, and activity of every boat, personal water craft, kayak, paddleboard, etc. Over the course of 29 flights in 2016, we counted 52,107 boats. The number of boats peaked at nearly 5,000 during the opening days of lobster season and summer holidays. On average, 19% of boats were involved in fishing, 19% were involved in diving, 13% were anchored (with no visible activity), and 9% of boats were at sandbars. Many of the boats we observed (29%) were in transit at the time; however, these boats likely participated in other activities throughout the day. In addition to diving and fishing, other watersports (e.g., kayaking, paddle boarding, jet skiing) and partying at sandbars were popular among the Sanctuary’s visitors and reflect alternative ways in which people enjoy Florida Keys waters. Our research team conducted a similar aerial survey in 1992, and the comparison of vessel use data between 1992 and 2016 shows that there has been a major increase (~400%) in the popularity of watersports (e.g., kayaking, paddle boarding, jet skiing) and partying at sandbars.
The 1992 aerial survey took place prior to the establishment of the Sanctuary Preservation Areas (Figure 1, SPAs). Establishment of the SPAs in 1997 limited consumptive activities within these areas and was intended to reduce conflicts between fishermen and divers. Because these areas were open to fishing during the 1992 aerial survey – including hook-and-line, recreational lobstering and commercial fishing, this allows us to examine how SPA implementation affected stakeholder activity. Currently, we are evaluating changes in dive and fishing boat spatial distributions after the SPAs were established.
Besides providing an outstanding office view for our scientists, this project provided essential information to the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary managers regarding vessel use in the Sanctuary and how that use has changed over time, which should aid in future management decisions regarding Sanctuary resources.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in cooperation with the Jacksonville Port Authority (JaxPort) have conducted a comprehensive economic, engineering and environmental study to examine the effects of increasing the depth of the existing Federally-maintained shipping channel in the lower St. Johns River (LSJR) from the current depth of 40-feet to a maximum depth of 47-feet between the mouth (Mayport, Florida) and river mile 13 (Figure 1). The channel deepening will allow access of larger vessels (Panamax and New Panamax classes) to deliver cargo to existing JaxPort terminals around Blount Island. The initial phase of dredging began in February 2018.
As part of the project evaluation, computer modeling scenarios were completed on the potential effects that the channel deepening might have on water quality, circulation patterns, salinity gradients, and a variety of ecological components (wetland vegetation, submerged aquatic vegetation, benthos, plankton, and nekton [macroinvertebrates and fish]) in the LSJR. Over 100 nekton species have been documented by the Fisheries-Independent Monitoring (FIM) program at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s (FWC) Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI) as using the estuarine portion of the LSJR and many of the species represent important commercial and recreational fisheries. During the evaluation, there were two specific areas the FIM program felt were in need of consideration with respect to nekton: 1) the potential effects of salinity changes on the spawning success, recruitment, and population dynamics of important recreational, commercial, and forage nekton and, 2) the potential effects of salinity changes on critical nekton habitat within the LSJR estuary.
Within the estuary, channel deepening has the potential to affect salinity and water quality gradients, most likely by shifting distributions in these gradients within the estuary. These shifts may affect spawning and nursery habitats and ultimately influence the reproductive and recruitment success of estuarine-dependent nekton. Of particular concern are the tidal tributaries in the LSJR near and upriver from the area being dredged. These tributaries between river miles 15 and 30 (Trout, Arlington, and Ortega rivers; Figure 1) and the estuarine section between Julington Creek (river mile 40) and Palatka (river mile 82; Figure 2) are highly influenced by freshwater inflow and generally have lower salinities than other portions of the LSJR estuary. The freshwater influence in these sections of the LSJR provides low salinity habitats that many estuarine and marine nekton require during their early life history stages. Previously collected data in these tributaries suggests that many recreationally and commercially important estuarine-dependent species (i.e. members of the Sciaenidae family [i.e. red drum, spotted seatrout, atlantic croaker, spot], white shrimp, blue crab, and mullet) utilize these habitats and that these areas likely represent critical habitats for maintaining healthy stocks of these species in the LSJR estuary and adjacent coastal waters. Also of concern with regards to potential changes in salinity would be impacts on resident freshwater species, especially within the Trout, Arlington, and Ortega rivers. Salinity increases could decrease the availability of freshwater habitat, thereby reducing the abundance of freshwater species in these tidal tributaries. The Mill Cove area, although freshwater inflow is limited, is also of concern because the salinity modeling done by the Corps identified it as the area most likely to experience the greatest salinity changes. Young-of-the-year (YOY) and juveniles from numerous nekton species utilize this habitat during ingress, egress, and as nursery habitats.
Since 2001, the Fisheries-Independent Monitoring (FIM) program has monitored nekton abundance and distribution in the LSJR estuary downstream of Julington Creek (river mile 40; Figure 1). Between 2005 and 2016, funding from the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) enabled the FIM program to extend sampling upriver from Julington Creek (river mile 40) to Palatka (river mile 82; Figure 2). The FIM program uses a multi-gear approach in a stratified-random sampling design to collect data on nekton from a wide range of habitats and life history stages. Water chemistry, habitat, and physical parameters are recorded at each sampling site. The FIM program sampling was designed to monitor fishery resources in the estuary as a whole and, therefore, does not include individual tributaries as specific sampling strata, but instead includes them as portions of larger geographic strata. The spatial extent of the tributaries is very small compared to that of the entire estuary, so the individual tributaries are often underrepresented and inconsistently sampled in the current sampling design. Data from the existing FIM program design, therefore, are not sufficient to assess changes in nekton composition and abundance due to perturbations, such as a channel deepening, within specific areas (tidal tributaries and coves). Estimating impacts to the nekton assemblage from the channel deepening in these areas requires a sampling strategy that focuses on these specific areas of the LSJR estuary.
To gain a better understanding of the relationships between channel deepening, salinity, water quality, water flow, estuarine habitats, and the abundance of estuarine-dependent and freshwater-resident species that inhabit the identified areas of the LSJR, the FIM program and the USACE have developed a long-term monitoring project to determine the impact of the dredging activities on the spatial distribution and abundance of nekton within the LSJR. The long-term monthly sampling, which began in May 2017, and has the potential to run through 2035 (funding dependent), will increase the resolution of nekton data within the identified tidal tributaries (Trout, Arlington, and Ortega rivers) and the Mill Cove area (Figure 1) as well as continue the long-term sampling upstream of Julington Creek (Figure 2), for which funding from the SJRWMD was withdrawn at the end of 2016. This project will allow for the assessment of the effects of channel deepening on nekton assemblages in these critical LSJR estuarine habitats.
The acoustic telemetry research activities in the Finfish Biology subsection of Marine Fisheries Research continue to deliver . . . in surprising fashion.
Answering concerns expressed by Florida panhandle anglers about the status of cobia in the Gulf of Mexico, a pilot project was conducted in Pensacola, Florida seeking to connect cobia (Rachycentron canadum) research between Gulf and Atlantic waters. And connect it did!
Typically, cobia, a coastal migratory species, are abundant along panhandle beaches during spring. The popular paradigm is that cobia migrate from warm wintering grounds in south Florida towards the productive Mississippi delta. Northern gulf anglers have noted decreases in catches during recent years and tournament records appear to support these anecdotal observations. Partly in response to these concerns, the FWC reduced daily bag limits of cobia in state waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Researchers formed relationships with knowledgeable captains to facilitate this pilot project, creating important relationships upon which future research by FWC and other institutions will be based. Thanks to their eager cooperation, six cobia were tagged with acoustic transmitters off Pensacola and two acoustic receivers were deployed in April 2017.
The receivers were retrieved by Finfish Biology divers in late May 2018. Logic and experience suggest such a low saturation of transmitters and receivers would have a low probability of yielding meaningful results. But, half of the six cobia were detected on the Pensacola receivers within miles of where they were originally tagged. Another tagged cobia was harvested farther east at Destin, Florida on November 2, 2017. Surprisingly, one Pensacola tagged fish was detected on receivers deployed off Cape Canaveral along the Atlantic coast of east-central Florida!
But it gets even better. The two Pensacola receivers that were deployed detected two cobia that were originally tagged off Cape Canaveral during Aug. 3-4, 2016. One of these was detected on receivers in the Florida Keys, then was detected later at two stations off Pensacola in June and July, 2017. It then returned to the Ft. Pierce area in southeast Florida where it was harvested on December 3, 2017. The other cobia that was tagged at Cape Canaveral was detected on receivers in the Keys, and was last detected off Pensacola on May 1, 2018.
The results of this pilot project with its scant resources have been significantly more fruitful than expected. The boundaries of the Gulf of Mexico cobia stock include southeast Florida based on genetic analysis. What appear to be fairly regular movements of cobia between at least Pensacola and Cape Canaveral supports this stock delineation and provides information on the northern extent of the stock boundary in southeast Florida, which has been uncertain. Expanded research should continue to close knowledge gaps about this important gamefish.
Major portions of the coastal embayments in northeastern Florida Bay have been closed to public access, and thus to recreational fishing, since the creation of the Crocodile Sanctuary in 1980. The 2015 Everglades National Park (ENP) General Management Plan called for the opening of Joe Bay, which is part of the Crocodile Sanctuary, to public, non-motorized access and catch-and-release fishing. The Fish and Wildlife’s Research Institute’s Fisheries Biology and Fisheries-Independent Monitoring (FIM) programs are involved in a cooperative study with Florida International University, the Snook and Gamefish Foundation, the Audubon Society, and the National Park Service to examine the effects of the 36-year closure and subsequent opening of Joe Bay to catch-and-release fishing.
To examine the effects of the closure on fish and macroinvertebrate (nekton) community metrics and recreationally important fish species, fisheries-independent and -dependent sampling methods are being employed across three embayments from 2016-2019 (Figure 1). Two of the embayments are in the Crocodile Sanctuary; Little Madeira Bay has been and will remain closed to fishing while Joe Bay was opened to fishing in November 2016. A third embayment, Long Sound, is not in the sanctuary and has been open to fishing the entire time. Although the three coastal embayments appear similar in size and function, there are substantial environmental differences among the basins. Freshwater inflow into Joe Bay is much greater than the other two basins, and sediment depth and the amount of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) are quite low. Long Sound also has a very thin sediment layer but typically had the highest salinity, and in recent years, has experienced an increase in SAV cover. Little Madeira Bay has both a thick sediment layer and a consistently high percentage of SAV cover that includes Thalassia, indicative of a climax seagrass community. These existing spatial and habitat relationships will affect the prey base and recreational fishes and will be considered in assessing the effectiveness of the new management strategy.
Fisheries-independent surveys are being conducted during wet and dry seasons by FWC using small (21.3-m) and large (183-m) seines and by FIU using baited remote underwater video systems (BRUVs) using GoPro technology (Figure 2). In the first year of seine sampling, nekton communities differed significantly among basins; relative abundance of nekton was greatest in Little Madeira Bay, and the most numerous species were small-bodied fish that serve as the prey base, such as killifishes, mojarras, gobies, and schooling fish (silversides and anchovies), collected by the small seine. Unfortunately, the large seine technique (which collected the majority of recreationally important species) was only used in Long Sound and Little Madeira Bay because the depths and substrate in Joe Bay are not suitable to this sampling gear. The BRUVs, however, were deployed in all basins, and in contrast to the seine sampling, indicated that community composition was similar across basins. Recreationally important species were most frequently observed in Little Madeira Bay in seines, but in Joe Bay on BRUVs. Sharks were seen frequently on video in Little Madeira Bay and may be affecting BRUV observations there. Trophic groups (small prey, large prey, mesoconsumers, and top predators) appeared stable over time as compared to previously collected seine data using the same methodology from 2006-2009, but there was preliminary evidence of species-specific differences within basins and over time.
Fisheries-dependent information is being obtained through an angler reporting system developed in conjunction with FIU, the Snook and Gamefish Association, and the Audubon Society (Figure 2, paper surveys and a mobile application). So far, the angler reporting system has a good response rate, but visitation to the recently opened no-motor zone in Joe Bay was low.
Two more years of sampling are ahead for this project, so more comprehensive data analyses incorporating hydrological and habitat dependencies are planned. Seine and BRUV nekton community data will be compared between gears and across estuaries, and the long-term trends in visitation and angler experiences documented by the angler reporting system will be examined. This project will provide useful data for developing a long-term protocol for fisheries monitoring in these embayments into the future and demonstrates the advantage of collaborative research to reach a common goal.
Bay scallops (Argopecten irradians) may have a short life, typically living for about a year, but they play a big role in the economies of many coastal Floridian towns, like Steinhatchee and Port St. Joe. In 2016, the scallop team within the molluscan fisheries group began a 10-year project to restore bay scallops to self-sustaining levels in Florida’s Panhandle. The project is funded by restoration money set aside after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and is intended to increase recreational fishing opportunities in the Florida Panhandle. The goal of the project is to increase depleted scallop populations and reintroduce scallops in suitable areas from which scallops have disappeared.
Restoration efforts are focused on coastal estuaries within the Florida Panhandle that have been divided into five regions, as shown on the map. Bay scallop populations in the Florida Panhandle are currently classified as ‘collapsed’ with population densities below 0.01 scallops per m2. In St. Joseph Bay, this collapse may be due in part to a red tide event that occurred from winter 2015-spring 2016. The red tide resulted in a lack of recruitment in 2016, leading to a sharp population decline. Scallop restoration efforts were primarily focused on St. Joseph Bay in 2016-2017. This year, restoration efforts will expand to St. Andrew Bay and St. George (regions 3 and 5).
The scallop team is planning to use a three-step approach to enhance bay scallop populations within targeted restoration areas in the Florida Panhandle by: (1) installing cages holding groups of adult bay scallops, (2) releasing hatchery-reared or naturally-harvested juvenile bay scallops (spat) at restoration sites, and (3) releasing hatchery-reared bay scallop larvae. Each year, the scallop team collects adult scallops from St. Joseph Bay and brings them to a hatchery which provides juvenile scallops the following year. These hatchery scallops are then placed in cages in a no-entry zone in St. Joseph Bay. Placing scallops in cages protects them from predators and increases the likelihood that scallops will successfully produce offspring during the spawning season. Beginning in 2017, scallop collectors were placed in St. Joseph Bay and St. Andrew Bay to collect wild scallop spat. The spat are raised at the Florida State University Coastal and Marine Laboratory and once they reach a size of 30mm they will be planted in cages in their respective bays. Last year we placed 2,500 wild and hatchery-produced scallops in cages in St. Joseph Bay.
In addition to traditional approaches to restoration, our vision for restoring scallops also includes educating the public about our ongoing restoration projects and asking them to be contributing partners in these efforts. To that end, we have recruited 200 volunteers to help restore scallops in St. Joseph Bay and St. Andrew Bay. In April, we will provide scallops and predator exclusion cages to these volunteers at workshops held in Panama City and Port St. Joe which will be hosted by our partners at Sea Grant. Our volunteers, or ‘Scallop Sitters’, will place their cages with scallops off privately-owned docks, or, if they have a boat, they will place these cages in the bay. We will give a webinar to discuss this project and provide training for our ‘Scallop Sitters’ through the FWC webinar series on April 16. Volunteers that are unable to attend our workshops in April will be able to view this webinar and participate in our scallop restoration program. We hope that by partnering with the community we will increase our chances of successful restoring scallops to stable levels (>0.1 scallops/m2) in St. Joseph Bay and St. Andrew Bay. If you have questions about the program or want to get involved, please email us at firstname.lastname@example.org.