Category Archives: Wildlife Research

Working to Conserve Florida’s Endemic and Imperiled Grasshopper Sparrow

By Becky Schneider and Erin Ragheb

The unique Florida dry prairie, a habitat type that has been substantially encroached upon by development, is where the endemic Florida grasshopper sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum floridanus) calls home. Named for both their diet and buzzy insect-like vocalizations, grasshopper sparrows are intensely secretive songbirds that prefer walking over flying and build their nests directly on the ground. The federally-endangered Florida subspecies is one of the rarest birds in North America, and population numbers are dwindling at alarming rates. If this downward population trend continues, the Florida grasshopper sparrow may become extinct within the next decade. Starting in 2013, we initiated an intensive demographic research project on the largest remaining population of Florida grasshopper sparrows, located at Three Lakes Wildlife Management Area, attempting to identify and alleviate the causes of decline.

Beginning in 2015, we placed nest cameras in front of Florida grasshopper sparrow nests to document specific causes of nest failure. We recorded previously unconfirmed nest predators including Eastern spotted skunks, Southern black racers, and red corn snakes. After identifying these key predators, we set out to develop a technique to effectively exclude hungry mammals and snakes from Florida grasshopper sparrow nests. In the subsequent field seasons, we designed and constructed predator fences and installed them around Florida grasshopper sparrow nests. These 10-ft wide exclosures are inconspicuous enough that the incubating female can return to her nest naturally but robust enough to keep predators at bay. The fences have proven to be highly effective at reducing nest predation, and a fenced nest is up to five times more likely to successfully fledge young than an unprotected nest.

Still, predation is not the only factor contributing to low nest success, and our predator fences are not effective at eliminating other sources of nest mortality such as flooding. To reduce the risk of nest loss by flooding, we developed a successful method for elevating nests prior to severe rain events. These intensive management actions have been effective at increasing annual fledgling production and will buy time to develop landscape-level conservation strategies.

Our color banding and resighting data demonstrate that low adult survival rates are another worrying cause of population decline. Apparent survival rates for adult males have decreased dramatically from 75% in 2014 to 36% in 2017. We have also observed recent declines in adult female survival and an increasingly male-biased sex ratio. Our next important step in this study is to determine the causes of reduced adult survival and explore management actions in response. We are now partnering with the University of Florida to screen wild birds for a suite of potential pathogens to identify if disease is contributing to reduced adult survival.

Stalling, stopping, and reversing the perilous decline of the Florida grasshopper sparrow is indeed a daunting task, but with a team of dedicated researchers and strong public support, we expect to conserve this charismatic songbird and increase our knowledge and understanding of Florida’s unique grassland prairie habitat.

Update on Panther Reproduction North of the Caloosahatchee River

By Marc Criffield

In March of 2017, FWC documented a female Florida panther with two kittens north of the Caloosahatchee River on the Babcock Ranch Preserve (BRP) via trail cameras (see April 2017 Field Notes). This followed the documentation of a female panther on the BRP in November 2016; the first since 1973. These were momentous events for the recovery of the endangered Florida panther.

Monitoring of these trail cameras by FWC, with support from a group of private and public partners, continued throughout 2017. These types of data collected on panthers will help guide the delineation of the boundary for the known breeding range as successful dens are verified.

No additional photos of the kittens from March 2017 were documented over the summer. This may be a testament to the hardships panther kittens face during their first year of life, a period where our analyses have demonstrated that survival rates are only 32%. If this litter did not survive, it certainly would not be unexpected.

A second litter of panther kittens was documented on the BRP on 22 November 2017. A female panther was photographed with two, approximately 4-month-old, kittens. Given that the number of documented females north of the River is so low, and that females will go into estrous soon after the loss of a litter, there is a high probability that this is the same female that produced a litter in March.

These events give some perspective as to the challenges impacting panther recovery. Although the loss of a litter is disappointing, new kittens demonstrate the resiliency of wild animals in their quest to survive. This most recent litter may certainly be comprised of survivors as they already weathered hurricane Irma in the confines of their den. This latest discovery offers renewed hope for the natural range expansion of panthers that is critical to their long-term recovery.

Investigating Loggerhead Sea Turtles and Where They Go When Not Nesting in Florida

By Simon Ceriani

Sea turtles, a long-living and highly migratory species, are a conservation concern that is primarily studied on nesting beaches, where they are easily accessible. However, only a small fraction of a female’s life is spent near a nesting beach. Reproductively active females undertake breeding migrations every 1 to 5+ years. These breeding migrations are often from distant foraging areas to their natal nesting beach, where they typically lay several clutches in a nesting season. Protecting sea turtle nesting habitat and monitoring nest counts is essential, but an understanding of where females are when they are not nesting (the majority of their time) is equally vital to ensure their protection.

The last decade has seen a growing interest in using stable isotopes, a type of intrinsic marker, as a tool to study migratory connectivity and identify foraging area locations. Work, combining satellite telemetry and stable isotope analysis, showed that post-nesting, satellite-tracked females migrating to geographically separate foraging areas can be identified by differences in their isotopic values. Thus, researchers have increasingly focused on sea turtle nesting aggregations by sampling nesting females and their nest and have used stable isotope analysis to infer foraging areas of larger numbers of untracked females.

Florida hosts ~90% of all the loggerhead nesting activity in the Southeast USA, yet few research groups encounter nesting females at night. In contrast, thousands of nests are marked to assess hatchling production through an extensive program coordinated by the FWC’s Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI). In 2013, we began a statewide project aiming to identify loggerhead foraging hotspots and determine inter-annual contribution of foraging areas to the Florida nesting aggregation. The project relies on the support and help of over a dozen Marine Turtle Permit Holders across Florida that collect non-viable eggs from a subsample of loggerhead nests marked as a part of FWRI’s hatchling Productivity Assessment Program. Sampling occurs over the entire course of the loggerhead nesting season and reflects nesting temporal distribution.

A few thousand non-viable loggerhead eggs are then transferred to the Sea Turtle Migration Research lab at FWRI Headquarters in St. Petersburg where interns and volunteers help prepare the eggs for analysis. Stable isotope values of unhatched eggs are then used to infer foraging areas used by females during the non-reproductive season.

This study provides a non-invasive and non-destructive method of sampling a relatively large percentage of the loggerhead population nesting in Florida and represents the most comprehensive geographic assessment of foraging areas to date. Using unhatched eggs to assign females to foraging grounds provides an opportunity to:

  1. Sample at a much larger scale, fostering collaborations among research groups and stakeholders
  2. Obtain information that is more representative at the population level
  3. Begin understanding the relative importance of foraging areas and how each foraging ground contribution changes among years.

Conservation funds are limited and there is a need to prioritize where funds should be spent to maximize conservation outcomes. Understanding relative importance of foraging areas will allow us to make more informed management decisions by focusing mitigation and by-catch reduction measures to areas that are loggerhead hotspots.

The first two years of this work were conducted when the principle investigator was at the University of Central Florida and were funded by the Florida Sea Turtle Grants Program. The Sea Turtle Grants Program is funded from proceeds from the sale of the Florida Sea Turtle License Plate.  Since 2015, the scope and scale of the project augmented thanks to the support of a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) – ESA Section 6 grant.

Florida Scrub-Jay Translocation Research

By Karl E. Miller

Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) populations throughout the state are vulnerable from the effects of habitat fragmentation. The species is mostly sedentary and rarely disperses long distances through non-scrub habitat. Currently, >90% of the remaining scrub-jay populations consist of fewer than 25 family groups.

FWC staff are conducting experimental translocations of Florida scrub-jays to determine the feasibility of a state-wide translocation program to stabilize smaller populations and prevent genetic isolation. The conservation goal is to transport – or “translocate” – birds from a large, stable population in the Ocala National Forest to smaller populations where extensive habitat has been restored but has not been discovered or occupied by Florida scrub-jays. FWC researchers are following up these translocations with intensive monitoring to determine whether the donor population is resilient to the loss of birds and also to determine their impact on populations at recipient sites.

During winter 2017 (December 22-March 21), we relocated 9 Florida scrub-jays, constituting 4 family groups, from Ocala National Forest to Seminole State Forest, which is a distance of >32 km. This initial translocation was a collaborative effort between staff from FWC, the Florida Forest Service, and the US Forest Service.

Translocated groups were tracked using radio telemetry to determine the extent to which they moved throughout the landscape and to understand interactions with neighboring groups. All birds survived transport and release and soon established breeding territories within 200 m of where they were released. During the first week of July, the first successful nest fledged.

In Ocala National Forest, the territories that were vacated were soon occupied by other Florida scrub-jays, including some groups that immigrated from adjacent sub-optimal habitat patches that were heavily overgrown.

Overall, translocated birds appeared to acclimate well to recipient sites, and populations at donor sites did not appear to be negatively affected, which suggests that future translocations will be a worthwhile tool for stabilizing and increasing populations of Florida scrub-jays on managed lands. During winter 2018, we will increase the number of birds moved and the number of recipient sites involved and continue to test the effectiveness of moving different age classes of scrub-jays. We will also continue to test the effectiveness of novel transport and release methods.

Floods, Fires and Hurricanes

By Elina Garrison

In 2015, FWC and other agencies partnered with the University of Georgia and Joseph W. Jones Ecological Center to begin “The South Florida Deer Research Project” in Big Cypress National Preserve (BCNP) and Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge (FPNWR). One of the main objectives of the study is to understand how hydrology, fire and predators impact deer populations in the unique South Florida system. To date, the team has captured close to 300 deer and fitted 263 adult deer with GPS radio-collars, yielding over 548,000 locations. In addition, three camera grids containing a total of 180 remote-sensing cameras were deployed to monitor deer and other species. Thus far, the team has recorded and cataloged over 360,000 photos. The study was designed to include four years of field work in an effort to capture seasonal and annual fluctuations in weather, predation, and hunting pressure. However, none of us would have expected to capture the weather extremes we have thus far!

In winter 2016, a normally dry season turned into a record-breaking high water event. By February the water stage was over 12 inches above normal and exceeded the prior winter flood record of 1995. We documented unusual deer movement activity, for example, the number of deer detections in our camera grid in FPNWR more than doubled as deer from lower elevations moved to higher ground. Luckily, the duration of the winter 2016 high water event did not last as long as it had 1995.

January in Florda is typically in the middle of the dry season. However, in 2016, an unusual amount of rain caused record flooding throughout our study area.

In March 2017, one of the largest wildfires in Florida started in BCNP. It would eventually burn over 21,000 acres, including an area that contained one of the project’s camera grids and numerous collared deer. No mortalities of collared deer occurred due to the fire and interestingly, deer stayed within their established home-ranges as the woods around them burned. Furthermore, collar data demonstrated deer in proximity to the burn moved into the burned landscape shortly after.

June 2017 brought another flooding event; more rain fell in three days (over 15 inches) than had in the previous 36 weeks, breaking another record. In some areas of BCNP, the water level rose five feet in three days.

Just two days after the large Cowbell Fire burned through much of North Addition Lands, one of the GPS-collared female deer emerges from the burn with another deer.


The most recent event, Hurricane Irma, just occurred. The eyewall of this massive hurricane came within 25 miles of our study site. None of the collared deer died during the hurricane, and preliminary data indicate some that deer moved into pine flatwoods and tropical hammocks, but overall movement rate did not decrease during the storm.

These “record-breaking” events make field work difficult, but they give us insight into impacts of weather extremes that may become more common in the future. The data gathered, both through telemetry and remote cameras, will allow us to analyze how these extreme events impact deer survival, movement, habitat use, and recruitment of fawns, and other aspects of deer ecology. In addition, although the study is focused on white-tailed deer, the cameras capture all wildlife that use these areas, allowing us to examine the effects of extreme weather at a community level.

For more information and quarterly updates, please visit the South Florida Deer project website.

Sea Turtle Tagging

By Allen Foley

In late June of this year, FWRI sea turtle researchers and their NOAA collaborators captured, tagged, and released 105 sea turtles from southwestern Florida Bay. This effort was part of a long-term study of sea turtles in Florida Bay that began in 1990.

These turtles are captured using two, 21’ Carolina Skiffs (each with a 2-person, seven-foot tower) that slowly motor through different areas searching for sea turtles. When a turtle is spotted, the boat is brought up behind it and a snorkeler dives in to catch the turtle and bring it to the surface. The turtle is then brought into the boat for study. The usual work-up involves weighing, measuring, and tagging each animal. A small sample of blood is also taken to determine gender (usually not externally detectable) and genetic identity (to see from which nesting rookery a turtle is from). Notes are made regarding any injuries or signs of disease and the turtle is then released.

The study focuses primarily on the loggerhead and green turtle, but also includes data collected on Kemp’s ridleys and hawksbills. About 1,200 sea turtles have been tagged by this project over the last 28 years and many individuals have been captured several times over time-spans as long as twenty years. In addition to documenting the sea turtle species and life stages that are present in this area, the data collected during this work allow researchers to monitor relative abundance, measure growth, determine sex ratios, identify the proportion of individuals from various nesting rookeries, monitor health status, discern movements, and document residency.

One of the health concerns is the occurrence, effect, and spread of fibropapillomatosis. This can be a severely debilitating and sometimes fatal disease that has already become widespread among green turtles, including those in Florida Bay. It is rare in other species of sea turtles but the Florida Bay study has documented an unusually high percent occurrence of fibropapillomatosis among loggerheads (about 10%). Long-term monitoring of individual loggerheads via recaptures allows researchers to document the progression and effects of this disease in loggerheads.

The Florida Bay study is the only long-term sea turtle study in Florida that regularly includes captures of adult male and female loggerheads on resident foraging grounds. That access allows researchers to study some lesser-known aspects of loggerhead behavior such as the reproductive behavior of male loggerheads and the movements of female loggerheads from the foraging ground to the nesting beach. Satellite telemetry has been used to track the movements of reproductively active male and female loggerheads from Florida Bay during the breeding season. This work led to the discovery of a likely breeding area just offshore of southeast Florida where male loggerheads wait to intercept female loggerheads moving from their foraging grounds to nesting beaches along the east coast of Florida.

A Pilot Study to Assess Translocation of Gopher Frogs as a Conservation Tool

By Traci Castellón and Anna Deyle

The gopher frog (Lithobates capito) is native to the Southeastern U.S., where it primarily inhabits sandhill, flatwoods, scrub, and other upland habitats. The species is declining in many parts of its range and is currently being reviewed for federal listing under the Endangered Species Act.

The distribution of the gopher frog is closely associated with that of the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), and it frequently lives commensally with tortoises in their burrows. Thus, gopher frogs are often encountered when burrows are excavated for gopher tortoise translocation. FWC policy previously allowed translocation of commensal species along with gopher tortoises. However, in 2012 concerns about potential impacts on commensal populations led to a halt in the practice pending research to assess outcomes.

Although translocation represents a potential strategy for mitigating impacts to animals that are at imminent risk due to habitat destruction, it also carries substantial risks. Few studies have assessed the impacts of translocation on amphibians, and translocation in adult gopher frogs has never been studied.

Translocation of amphibians is complicated because many species, including gopher frogs, have strong homing mechanisms that help them navigate to specific breeding ponds each year. This homing instinct is usually beneficial, but several translocations of amphibians have failed because animals tried to return to their capture site, often resulting in death as they attempted to navigate through an unfamiliar landscape.

To assess outcomes of gopher frog translocation, FWRI and HSC biologists are conducting a pilot study to experimentally translocate gopher frogs, then track them using radio-telemetry to evaluate survival and movement patterns. Gopher frogs were captured at breeding ponds and tortoise burrows from several locations in the Ocala National Forest and translocated to a single recipient site in another part of the forest.

Of the 21 translocated frogs, 67% survived for the duration of monitoring (2 to 5 months). Mortality was largely due to predation by snakes, which usually occurred within the first two weeks following translocation. Translocated frogs tended to have relatively high rates of movement immediately upon their release. During this period mortality was high, but survival increased once they settled into a single location (burrow or root hole) and began to move less frequently. None of the surviving frogs attempted a long-distance dispersal, either back toward the capture site or in any other direction, suggesting a relatively high probability for retention of translocated frogs at release sites. These preliminary results suggest that translocation may be a viable conservation approach when frogs are at risk due to habitat destruction at development sites.

In addition to our telemetry study, we plan to collect DNA samples from tadpoles at the recipient-site breeding pond for several years following the translocation. We will compare genetic samples from tadpoles with those from translocated adults to determine if any tadpoles captured at the recipient site are descended from translocated individuals. This would indicate that translocated frogs survived long enough to breed and were able to navigate to a breeding pond at the recipient site, both key indicators of translocation success.

Although translocation can be an effective tool for conservation under the right circumstances, it is not without risk. Future studies are needed to evaluate the risks of disease transmission, the impact of translocation on long-term survival and intra-specific competition, and to determine if movement and survival results from our pilot study hold true for populations in other locations. Nonetheless, our results suggest that gopher frog translocation has the potential for success, at least in terms of survivability and retention of translocated individuals at release sites.

Restoring Florida’s Shorebird and Seabird Populations

By Janell Brush

Florida has 1,350 linear miles of ocean coastline and over 8,000 miles of tidal inlets. This equates to a lot of potential nesting, foraging, and roosting habitat for shorebirds and seabirds. These dynamic habitats are declining in quality and quantity and are stressed by human population growth, climate and habitat changes, as well as ecological or human perturbations. The coastal zone is highly sought after for development and tourism because of its aesthetic and recreational values. Consequently, there is little undeveloped beach habitat remaining, and what does remain is often disturbed and degraded to the detriment of coastal species, such as nesting shore- and seabirds, that are dependent on it.

Over the last decade, FWC has worked with Audubon Florida and the Florida Park Service to opportunistically build a network of partners and developed a strategy to maintain shorebird and seabird populations that are resilient to the pressures placed on coastal habitats and wildlife. In 2009 we launched the Florida Shorebird Alliance (FSA), which is organized into regional partnerships that work locally to ensure important shorebird and seabird sites are surveyed, monitored, and managed. The FWC houses key FSA staff who build and coordinate partnerships, manage the Florida Shorebird Database and shorebird monitoring program, and oversee FSA communications. We realized that developing our current program and expanding resources for a dedicated shorebird program would allow us to focus staff and dedicate resources needed to implement meaningful conservation for these species.

As a component to restore shorebird populations, Florida and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) undertook a two-year planning effort that resulted in a business plan, Florida Beach-nesting Bird Plan. The plan was completed in 2016 and includes specific population goals, metrics, strategies, timelines, funding needs, and a conceptual framework. We recently received a grant through the NFWF Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund (GEBF) to begin implementation of the Florida Beach-nesting Bird Plan.

This project expands upon foundational shorebird conservation work by inaugurating a dedicated shorebird and seabird program for the State of Florida.   FWC (FWRI and HSC) will work with its key partner, Audubon Florida, to continue to recover shorebird populations using five strategies: reduce human disturbance, manage habitat, manage predation, inform management & track outcomes, and improve regulatory coordination. The project area encompasses a variety of habitats used by breeding, wintering, and migrating shorebirds. These habitats include rooftops, sand beaches, emergent flats, dredge spoil islands, marine and freshwater sand bars, oyster reefs, freshwater wetlands, and upland construction and industrial sites.

FWC’s Fish and Wildlife Research Institute contributes substantially to the strategies and serves as lead for the effort to inform management and track outcomes. The 4 year project represents Phase 1 of a larger vision and will conclude with a focused review of all program activities to assess programmatic efficacy. This approach will provide the information needed to develop an efficient and effective statewide program, which we hope to fund through a variety of identified funding streams as well as continued short- and long-term GEBF support. By the end of this project FWRI staff will have refined baseline population estimates and trends for 5 focal species (American oystercatcher, black skimmer, least tern, Wilson’s plover, snowy plover), completed threat assessment studies, and developed apredation management database and monitoring framework. This is an exciting time for shorebird and seabird conservation in Florida and with additional resources we hope to continue to move the needle for shorebird conservation.

Searching for Shrews

Photo Caption: This short-tailed shrew captured in north Florida is similar in appearance to the enigmatic Sherman’s short-tailed shrew of southwest Florida. 

By Chris Winchester and Jeff Gore

Short-tailed shrews (Blarina carolinensis) occur throughout Florida, but individuals in Collier and Lee counties in south Florida are larger and they are considered to be a separate species known as Sherman’s short-tailed shrew (Blarina shermani). Little is known about this shrew because it has seldom been observed, in fact the distribution and taxonomy of this species are based primarily on several specimens collected at a few locations in the 1950’s.

To determine the current status of Sherman’s short-tailed shrews, FWRI biologists initiated a study using drift-fence arrays set on public lands within the shrew’s presumed range in southwest Florida. Drift-fence arrays are a common method for capturing shrews and they consist of silt fencing erected to direct shrews and other small animals into pitfall buckets sunk into the ground along the fence. Despite an extensive survey effort involving 63 drift fence arrays and more than 23,900 trap days (1 pitfall trap set for 1 day), biologists captured only 3 short-tailed shrews. Over that same survey period, they captured more than 250 least shrews (Cryptotis parva).

These results show that although short-tailed shrews are still present within the presumed range of Sherman’s short-tailed shrew, they are either quite rare or very difficult to detect compared to other shrews. The next step is to work with partners to compare DNA from the 3 recently collected specimens to DNA from previously collected specimens to determine if the recently trapped shrews are indeed Sherman’s short-tailed shrews and just how genetically unique these shrews are from other short-tailed shrews.

Panther Kittens North of Caloosahatchee River

by Carli Segelson

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) has verified the presence of at least two panther kittens north of the Caloosahatchee River in southwest Florida. These kittens are presumed to be the offspring of the first wild female panther documented north of the river since 1973.

“This is good news for Florida panther conservation,” said Kipp Frohlich, deputy director for the FWC’s Division of Habitat and Species Conservation. “Until now, we only had evidence of panthers breeding south of the Caloosahatchee. These pictures of a female with kittens indicate there are now panthers breeding north of the river.”

Using trail cameras, biologists have monitored male panthers on various public and private lands north of the Caloosahatchee River for several years. In 2015, biologists collected a photo of what appeared to be a female panther in the FWC’s Babcock Ranch Preserve Wildlife Management Area in Charlotte County. They deployed additional cameras in the summer of 2016 and captured more images of what they believed to be a female panther.

“Early this year, the cameras captured images of a female that appeared to be nursing,” said Darrell Land, FWC panther team leader. “For many years, the Caloosahatchee River has appeared to be a major obstacle to northward movement of female panthers.  This verification of kittens with the female demonstrates panthers can expand their breeding territory across the river naturally.”

“This is a major milestone on the road to recovery for the Florida panther,” said FWC Chairman Brian Yablonski. “We are mindful and appreciative of all the many partners and cooperators who have supported panther conservation efforts over the years leading to meaningful moments like this.”

The FWC works closely with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to ensure panther conservation on both private and public lands. Staff also work to continue building support and cooperation among private landowners who maintain working landscapes and ranches that provide important habitat for panthers.

“This is good news for panther recovery, and the Service is committed to working with landowners to make panthers and private land ownership compatible,” said Larry Williams, State Supervisor of Ecological Services for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.